Accompanying material on forced drugging and the lack of information on side effects available to patients. Offering to send more information and suggesting that Hentoff be informed of the Rogers v. Okin right to refuse treatment case in Boston. Asserting that forced drugging and the threat of commitment are means of patient control and are afforded little to no appropriate oversight. Pointing out the absurdity of "voluntary" commitment when the threat of commitment exists should the patient attempt to voluntarily leave a psychiatric facility.
All rights for this image are held by the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Requests to publish, redistribute, or replicate this material should be addressed to Special Collections and University Archives, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.
Contact host institution for more information.